CLOSE SEARCH
A Mesher Order is a type of financial order made by the Family Court which postpones the sale of the matrimonial home until a specified future event.
Rather than requiring the property to be sold immediately following divorce or separation, the order provides for one party, typically the parent with whom the children primarily live, to remain in the property for an agreed period. The other party retains a financial interest in the property, which is realised when an agreed trigger event occurs and the property is sold or one party purchases the other's interest.
The purpose of a Mesher Order is to balance competing priorities. It may allow children to remain living in the family home while recognising that both parties have a financial interest in the property that will ultimately need to be realised.
Importantly, a Mesher Order does not permanently determine ownership of the property. Instead, it creates a framework for postponing the sale whilst setting out how the property will be occupied, managed and ultimately dealt with when the deferred sale eventually takes place.
In practice, we spend as much time in the first meeting explaining what a Mesher Order is not as what it is. It does not give the resident spouse the property outright, it does not release the other spouse from the mortgage, and it does not put the financial dispute to bed. Understanding those limits at the outset helps clients decide whether a deferred sale genuinely fits their family or whether an alternative such as an immediate sale, a transfer with an offset, or a Martin Order would be a better fit.
Every Mesher Order is tailored to the circumstances of the family, but they generally deal with:
• who will remain living in the property;
• who continues to own the property and in what shares;
• when the property will eventually be sold;
• what happens if one party wishes to purchase the other's interest before then; and
• how the sale proceeds will ultimately be divided.
Many people assume a Mesher Order simply postpones the sale until the youngest child reaches 18 or finishes full-time education. While this is one of the most common arrangements, it is by no means the only option.
The trigger event forms only one part of the order. In reality, many of the most important provisions concern what happens during the years before the property is eventually sold.
Commonly, we see the trigger event grab most of the client's attention at the outset, but it is the mechanics of the years in between, who pays the mortgage, who insures and maintains the property, whether either party can force an early sale, and how any capital contributions are accounted for at the end, that generate almost all of the arguments once the order is in place.
Mesher Orders are a common part of divorce finances where there are children and where there are limited funds and especially where :-
it would be detrimental and unfairly prejudice one party/dependent children to immediately sell the property. For example, when there is not enough capital in the matrimonial assets to meet the parties’ housing needs.
where there are young children whose housing needs take priority and the parent caring for the children has limited financial resources and unable to re-house suitably.
Choosing the right option requires consideration of the family's finances as a whole rather than looking at the property in isolation.
More often than not, the clients for whom a Mesher Order works best are those who genuinely need the breathing space it provides, typically a resident parent with school-age children and limited standalone borrowing capacity and whose former spouse can afford to wait for their capital. Where either of those conditions is missing, we usually find that a cleaner solution such as an immediate sale, a straight transfer with an offset, or a lump sum on deferred terms produces a better outcome for both sides.
Common trigger events resulting in a sale of the property are :-
The youngest child reaching 18 years or ceasing full-time education.
On the re-marriage of the party occupying the property.
If the party occupying the property co-habits for a period of 6 months or more.
On the death of the party occupying the property.
When the property is no longer the occupying party’s primary residence.
If the parties’ financial circumstances change, the parties can also agree to sell the property before any of the triggering events occur.
Mesher Orders can be an appropriate way to deal with the family property with minimal disruption to family life. If the immediate sale of the family home would cause personal or financial hardship, Mesher Orders are particularly attractive.
It is not unusual for the biggest benefit of a Mesher Order to turn out to be quite different from the one that first attracted the client. Clients often come to us focused on keeping the family home for the children; in the negotiations that follow, the real value frequently turns out to be the additional time the deferred sale creates to restructure pensions, resolve a business interest or allow a spouse's earning capacity to recover before the property is finally sold.
Mesher orders are financially attractive particularly :-
Where one party does not have the financial ability to take over the mortgage alone and release the other from the mortgage terms, costs can be saved when transferring the property to the receiving party.
The capital value may increase over time whilst both parties maintain their shares in the property.
If the housing market is depressed, a deferred sale may benefit until such a time as the market has recovered whilst continuing to provide a home for the party and dependent children.
Mesher Orders are a pragmatic option however are not suitable in all cases as there are disadvantages. These orders :-
Tie the parties financially as they remain linked in respect of the property. Where there is acrimony, this arrangement could potentially lead to further polarisation of the parties.
With capital being tied up in the family home for so long, the non-occupying party may find it difficult to raise a new mortgage and purchase another property in the interim, with the additional costs such as higher Stamp Duty Land Tax or higher mortgage interest rates for a second property.
A Mesher Order can also bring about Capital Gains Tax consequences which may require expert tax advice.
The non-occupying party may find themselves having to apply to the court for an order for sale to recover their capital.
Time and again, we act on cases where the difficulty is not the original Mesher Order at all but a change in circumstances five or ten years later: one party wants to remortgage, an inheritance arrives, a child stays in full-time education longer than expected, or the property market moves sharply. Building sensible flexibility into the order at the outset is almost always cheaper than trying to renegotiate it years later, particularly if relations between the parties have cooled in the meantime.
Mesher Orders are highly flexible and can be tailored to suit the family’s needs. Parties can agree on:
Trigger events - sale of the home can be triggered by the youngest child turning 18, finishing education, the resident parent remarrying or cohabiting, or a fixed future date.
Division of proceeds - the share each party receives on eventual sale can be fixed upfront or vary depending on future contributions (e.g. if one party pays the mortgage alone).
Mortgage responsibility - the order can set out who will pay the mortgage and household bills. Parties may also agree on how any missed payments or arrears will be handled.
Occupation terms - the resident party’s right to remain in the home, and whether they can bring in new partners or tenants, can be addressed clearly in the order.
Buyout option - one party may be given the right to buy out the other’s interest before sale, often with an agreed method for valuation.
Review clauses - provisions can be added to revisit the arrangement if circumstances change significantly, such as job loss, serious illness, or mortgage unaffordability.
Adjustments - contributions (like paying the full mortgage or repairs) made during the deferral can be considered when dividing sale proceeds, if agreed in advance.
Each of these terms should be clearly recorded in the order to avoid future disputes.
A key consideration is that both parties may remain jointly liable for the mortgage, even if only one remains living in the property. This can:
Limit the other party’s ability to borrow or get a new mortgage
Create credit risks if payments are missed
Require ongoing communication and financial cooperation
It's essential to check with the mortgage lender whether they will consent to the arrangement, and whether any changes to the mortgage terms are required.
Since a Mesher Order may last for many years, it’s sensible to include flexibility for unexpected changes. Parties can agree to:
Allow an earlier sale if one party becomes unable to pay the mortgage
Permit review of the order after a fixed period or if certain conditions occur
Adjust how sale proceeds are split if future contributions become unequal
These built-in protections can reduce future litigation and ensure fairness over time.
If one party moves out and the property is not sold for several years, they may face a CGT liability on their share when it is eventually sold, as it may no longer qualify for full private residence relief. Tax advice should be taken before agreeing to a Mesher Order to understand the financial consequences.
While traditional Mesher Orders often last until children reach adulthood, some couples prefer shorter deferral periods, such as:
A 2–5 year delay to allow the resident parent to adjust financially
A fixed sale date to take advantage of a stronger property market
Martin Orders, which defer sale indefinitely but without children involved (usually where one party needs housing security for life)
These alternatives provide flexibility while still addressing individual needs and housing arrangements.
Should you wish to discuss any aspect of divorce, finances on divorce or Mesher Order issues, please do get in contact.
Although often confused with Mesher Orders, a Martin Order is different. It generally postpones the sale of the property without linking the trigger event to dependent children and is more commonly used where housing needs arise for other reasons, such as later-life divorce.
Choosing between these options requires consideration of the financial settlement as a whole rather than focusing solely on the family home.
Our experience is that Martin Orders come into their own in later-life divorce, where a spouse who has been out of the workforce for many years may not be able to rehouse to an equivalent standard on their share of the equity alone, and where dependent children are no longer a factor. The trigger events in those cases, usually cohabitation, remarriage or death, need particularly careful drafting because they may not arise for a decade or more after the order is made.
Yes. If you reach an agreement through solicitor negotiations or mediation, the terms can usually be incorporated into a Financial Consent Order for approval by the court. Whilst the court’s approval is needed, there will be no contested court process. The court can always intervene, but if the agreement is sensible and clearly puts the needs of children first, it is unlikely the court will interfere with what you have agreed.
That will usually depend on the wording of the order. Some arrangements contain mechanisms allowing an earlier buyout or sale in specified circumstances, while others require the original trigger event to occur first.
Often, yes. Many Mesher Orders include, or can be negotiated to include, provisions allowing one party to purchase the other's interest before the deferred sale date, provided suitable valuation and funding arrangements can be agreed.
Changes in the property market can affect both parties. Depending on how the settlement has been structured, increases or decreases in value may have a significant impact on the eventual outcome, making early strategic advice particularly important.
Whether cohabitation triggers a sale depends on the wording of the order. Many Mesher Orders provide that cohabitation by the resident spouse for a defined continuous period, often six months, is a trigger event. Cohabitation by the non-resident spouse is usually not a trigger, but it may still be relevant when spousal maintenance or wider financial arrangements are being reviewed.
Get in touch
If you would like to speak with a member of the team you can contact us on: