CLOSE SEARCH
We have a highly experienced team of specialist lawyers who deal with probate, estate administration and probate related disputes. If you need solicitors to advise on removing an executor or any other issue relating to a will or probate, please do call or email.
Friction between executors and beneficiaries is common. Beneficiaries often feel that executors are dealing with the estate administration too slowly, are being unhelpful or are incompetent. Executors often feel that beneficiaries do not understand the need for a thorough approach where some degree of delay is part of doing the job properly.
Sometimes, executors do not want to undertake the role when the time comes. In that situation they can formally renounce their role so long as they have not intermeddled in the estate.
Based on our experience of dealing with many beneficiary clients, it’s important to adopt a measured approach. Threatening legal action at the beginning, before all the facts are known, is not recommended. Legal proceedings to remove an executor who just seems slow, arrogant or unco-operative are difficult and high risk.
Under English law, an executor can resign part way through the administration of an estate and can be invited to do so. This is known as "renunciation."
However, there are some important conditions to be aware of:
No Intermeddling - renunciation is only possible if the executor has not yet started actively dealing with the estate. This means they haven't taken any steps such as selling assets or paying debts.
Deed of Renunciation - to formally renounce, the executor must sign a legal document called a Deed of Renunciation.
Replacement Executor - it's crucial to ensure there's a suitable replacement executor to take over the responsibilities. If there are other executors named in the will, they can continue. If not, alternative options may be considered, such as a beneficiary or a professional executor.
If an executor has already started acting, they cannot simply resign. In such cases, a court application may be necessary to remove them and appoint a replacement.
The first step for beneficiaries with concerns should be to formally write to the Executor(s) seeking information.
The legal duty of executors is to keep all beneficiaries “reasonably informed”, which gives the executor(s) considerable leeway. This is where a measured approach, with the assistance of lawyers, can assist and initial communications with the executors especially where they seem to be reluctant to provide any or the bare minimum of information, may assist. At the initial stages, this would typically only be information about income, distributions and expenses, which information should be provided as early as possible if requested.
The chances of successfully pressurising executors are also increased if all or a clear majority in number of beneficiaries act together, so it’s important to speak with other beneficiaries before seeking to take any steps.
In general, the following steps may be involved:
Obtain the consent of all beneficiaries: Unless the will specifically provides otherwise, all beneficiaries must agree to the removal of an executor. If any beneficiary objects, the court may still allow the removal if it is in the best interests of the estate.
File a petition with the court: If all beneficiaries consent, the person seeking to remove the executor will need to file a petition with the Probate Court. The petition will need to state the reasons why the executor should be removed. Documents which will need to be prepared and filed include :-
Original grant of probate or administration
Detailed statement outlining your reasons for removal
Inventory of estate assets and beneficiary list
Proposed replacement executor's details and consent
Witness statement supporting the replacement's suitability
Serve the petition on the executor: Once the petition is filed, it must be served on the executor. The executor has the right to respond to the petition and to argue that they should not be removed.
Hearing: If the executor disputes the petition, there will be a hearing before the Probate Court. The court will hear evidence from both sides and then make a decision about whether or not to remove the executor.
Order of removal: If the court orders the executor to be removed, the court will also appoint a new executor. The new executor will have all of the same powers and responsibilities as the old executor.
The application to remove is generally brought under Section 50 Administration of Justice Act 1985. This provides that the High Court can remove an executor if this is necessary for the proper administration of the state and to protect the beneficiaries. The court will consider the evidence and factors which include :-
Has there been any wrongdoing and if so, will this impact the beneficiaries materially? - examples would be fraud, where the Executor uses estate money or assets for their own benefit or conflict of interest, for example, where an executor is also a beneficiary but can also apply where the executor is not. A conflict of interest might arise, for example, if the executor is interested in buying an asset of the estate, such as a property. In that situation, the executor would need to be able to clearly demonstrate acting in the overall best interests of beneficiaries. Where a court is satisfied the executor has or is not acting in the best interests, removal is a likely outcome.
Any evidence available as to how significant it was for the deceased to have his or her chosen executors administer the estate.
Is the executor clearly being unco-operative or delaying, such as failing to provide basic financial information to the beneficiaries? - delay is a huge source of frustration for beneficiaries, particularly when they don’t get their inheritance within a few months of death. However, beneficiaries must be advised that executors have a duty to act carefully and prudently, ensuring that they have identified assets and debts. Often, the main asset is a property, and executors will want to make sure that the valuation of the property is reasonable and that the best sale price is obtained. To avoid conflict, sensible executors should keep beneficiaries fully updated as to why there may be delays. Estate administration can commonly take up to a year from the date of death (and sometimes much more). This is why an application to court for removal would be very risky within the first year.
Is the executor incompetent? - there is a difference between the standard of skill and experience expected from a non-professional executor than there is where the executor(s) is/are accountants or lawyers for example. Where there are doubts about competence, before seeking removal, beneficiaries should seek to actively assist the executor, perhaps suggesting that professional help I sought, with the approval of the beneficiaries, at the cost of the estate.
Has the executor been charged or convicted for a criminal offence?
Does the executor have a physical or mental impairment which means they are incapable of carrying out the role?
Who might be appointed to replace the executor? – this is especially relevant where the estate is not high value or complex so that appointing professionals as replacement might not be proportionate. In that scenario, who else might be a suitable replacement?
Is the dispute largely based on a breakdown in relations or personal animosity? - if the court decides that this is the main driving factor in the application to remove, it is unlikely to make the order.
An alternative application may be available under Part 64 of the Civil Procedure Rules. This is a more narrowly focused application where the Executor is refusing to provide or providing incomplete accounts to beneficiaries. It can be a useful way of putting pressure on the executor to start co-operating with and keeping beneficiaries informed.
Successfully represented clients in removing their co-executor and appointing a replacement, independent, administrator in their place. Claimants costs were agreed to be borne 50% from the estate and 50% by the Defendant personally, from his share of the estate.
Represented a client with an application to remove his sibling as sole executor of their mother’s estate and have an independent professional person appointed in replacement. Following this Order being made, we made a committal application against the sibling, for them failing to comply with the terms of the Order made against them. The client successfully recovered the entirety of their costs for all proceedings.
Get in touch
If you would like to speak with a member of the team you can contact us on:
